“This section is not considered illegal, a subscription, a contribution or agreement, a sign, a prize or a sum of money, the value or amount of five hundred rupees or up, for or for a sign, a price or a sum of five hundred rupees or up. “. Wallace. Can we say that the agreement under consideration is a betting contract, if we take into account these exceptional characteristics of a betting contract? I don`t think so. Deem of the circumstances, judge already… The circumstances really show that it can only be a betting contract. For the above reasons, I agree with the preliminary authorities as the ex of the agreement. A, is not considered a contract as a bet… Defending the prosecution. The applicant was persuaded to turn over these documents to the defendants so that they could prepare their defence in their action under the Ex agreement. A, executed by the accused…

An interesting interpretation of this case was that, although all illegal agreements are nullified and unenforceable, not all non-legal agreements are illegal or immoral or contrary to public order. Although all betting agreements are null and private and are not yet applicable in a betting agreement, it is therefore important to verify whether such an agreement is also illegal under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, in order to verify its legality. There is a big difference between the English and Indian betting laws: under the English Gaming Act of 1845, agreements that are security of the betting contract are also voided, whereas in India, collateral agreements with betting agreements are not necessarily non-astreigs because the purpose of this guarantee contract does not necessarily have to be illegal. A and B agree that if it rains on Tuesday, A 100 Rs. will pay to B and if it doesn`t rain on Tuesday, B 100 Rs. will pay. Such an agreement is a betting agreement and is therefore not concluded. Since a betting contract is a nullity contract, there are certain exceptions to this effect that relate to section 25 in section 30 below: cases in which the agreements are null and for nothing, although the consideration or purpose of this agreement is not necessarily illegal. An illegal agreement is therefore not authorized by law, or can be said to be prohibited by law, whereas in the event of a non-agreement, “the law can only say that if it is made, the courts will not enforce it.”